soft ambition is a concept that doesn’t sit well with people who romanticize struggle. you know the type—the ones who believe success must be chased, wrangled, and earned through sheer exhaustion. they thrive on five-year plans, power poses, and linkedin humblebrags about waking up at 5 a.m. to “grind.” but what if success didn’t have to feel like a war? what if ambition could be… soft?
this isn’t about laziness, though the hustle crowd would like you to believe that anything less than burnout is slacking off. soft ambition is about playing the long game without losing yourself in the process. it’s about wanting success, but on your own terms—without sacrificing your sanity, health, or joy along the way. it’s ambition without the sharp edges.
in a world that equates suffering with legitimacy, soft ambition is radical. we glorify the people who push themselves to the brink, who give up sleep and relationships for their goals. steve jobs was a genius, sure, but he was also famously difficult and obsessed to the point of cruelty. do we really want to model our lives after that? the idea that suffering is necessary for success is one of the greatest scams of modern culture. yes, hard work matters. but the belief that ambition must be a full-contact sport? outdated.
consider the slow but undeniable shift happening in work culture. people are opting out of the traditional rat race, rejecting hustle culture in favor of something more sustainable. the quiet quitting trend, the rise of four-day work weeks, the influx of people moving to smaller cities to escape the burnout of corporate life—all signs of a cultural shift toward soft ambition.
historically, the most ambitious people weren’t always the loudest or most aggressive. for example, jane austen—arguably one of the most influential writers in english literature. she wasn’t networking at literary salons or self-promoting in newspapers. she wrote quietly, consistently, and in the spaces available to her, and she changed literature forever; or look at hayao miyazaki, the legendary filmmaker behind studio ghibli. he never rushed to compete with hollywood. instead, he created films slowly, with intention, and refused to let the pressures of the industry dictate his pace. and yet—his films continue to outlive trends and remain some of the most beloved stories of all time.
soft ambition isn’t about doing less—it’s about doing things differently. it’s about trusting that slow growth is still growth. it’s about redefining success so that it doesn’t leave you burnt out and miserable by the time you get there.
in practical terms, this might mean:
• prioritizing depth over speed—doing great work instead of rushing to do all the work
• working hard, but within boundaries that protect your time and energy
• building a career or business in a way that supports your life, instead of the other way around
• not measuring success by traditional metrics, but by whether your work actually aligns with your values
we’ve been sold this idea that if you’re not constantly suffering for your goals, you’re not ambitious enough. but what if the real flex is getting everything you want without making yourself miserable in the process? success cannot be about how much you grind—it’s about how much you get to enjoy the life you’ve built.
Cal Newport’s books titled Slow Productivity and Deep Work resonate with your note. Can’t have enough of these reminders in today’s world. Most of us “elders” grew up in a slower world and we have a nostalgic “home” to retreat to. Now your generation is faced with the challenge of creating your “home” despite the deluge of insignificant noise you must sort through. I wish you well because this is an incredibly important concept and task. Maybe even a duty.
A good starting point is asking oneself "what does success mean to me?". For most, the answer is having money. Yet, that is not the right answer. Or rather, it is an incomplete thought.
Money for what? To do what?
To feel what?
There is your answer. Go towards that!