20s struggle theory
the twenties have excellent public relations for a decade that often feels like being handed a life in flat-pack form without the tiny allen key. from the outside, the decade is supposed to look light. young enough to experiment, old enough to be interesting, free enough to move, flexible enough to reinvent, unburdened enough to “figure it out.” people talk about the twenties as if they are one long open window. the reality is less graceful because most people are trying to become a person while also trying to pay for being one. they are choosing careers before understanding work, falling in love with partners before understanding love, picking cities before understanding loneliness, boxing themselves in identities while still recovering from the last version of themselves. naturally, this creates some internal weather.
if milk & cookies has become part of your week, now’s a great time to join. 🤍 annual memberships are 25% off for one week only.
psychologist jeffrey arnett described “emerging adulthood” as the period from the late teens through the twenties when people move through identity exploration, instability, self-focus, feeling in-between, and a sense of possibilities. the theory was never meant to make the decade sound cute. it explains why so many people in their twenties feel suspended between freedom and panic because life is wide open, which sounds wonderful until you realize wide open also means insufficiently assembled. there are too many possible selves standing around with clipboards.
the first part of 20s struggle theory is this: possibility is exhausting when it has no structure.
